<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Gilles en vrac... &#187; biologie</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.gillesenvrac.ca/carnet/tag/biologie/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.gillesenvrac.ca/carnet</link>
	<description>des cailloux, bijoux, joujoux...</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 15:47:23 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>simulations du cerveau</title>
		<link>http://www.gillesenvrac.ca/carnet/2009/11/simulations-du-cerveau/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gillesenvrac.ca/carnet/2009/11/simulations-du-cerveau/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Nov 2009 17:02:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>gilles</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[biologie]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[neurologie]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sciences]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gillesenvrac.ca/carnet/?p=2941</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[144 teraoctets de mémoire, 147 000 processeurs&#8230; les ensembles de connexions prétendant simuler la complexité neuronale deviennent géants ! Mais ils ne sont pas plus convaincants. Comme le dit Lehrer: the talents of our mind are inseparable from the evolved &#8230; <a href="http://www.gillesenvrac.ca/carnet/2009/11/simulations-du-cerveau/">Lire la suite <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>144 teraoctets de mémoire, 147 000 processeurs&#8230; les ensembles de connexions prétendant simuler la complexité neuronale <a href="http://p9.hostingprod.com/@modha.org/">deviennent géants</a> ! Mais ils ne sont pas plus convaincants. Comme le dit <a href="http://scienceblogs.com/cortex/2009/11/reverse-engineering.php">Lehrer</a>:</p>
<blockquote><p>the talents of our mind are inseparable from the evolved quirks of its machinery, which suggests that simply crossing some arbitrary computational threshold &#8211; such as simulating 1.6 billion ersatz &laquo;&nbsp;neurons&nbsp;&raquo; &#8211; doesn&#8217;t mean very much if those simulations aren&#8217;t rooted in biological reality. A neuron isn&#8217;t just another electrical switch; our cells are much more interesting than that. (&#8230;) [w]e sometimes forget that the &laquo;&nbsp;mind is like a computer&nbsp;&raquo; metaphor is only a metaphor. The mind is really just a piece of meat.</p></blockquote>
<p>La simulation du cerveau par un ordinateur me semble aussi improbable que la simulation de la vie : les seules choses qu&#8217;on réussit à simuler sont des caricatures de vie (ou de fonctionnement neuronal) parce que la &laquo;&nbsp;programmation&nbsp;&raquo; de la vie (et du cerveau) ont été faites par un <a href="http://www.amazon.ca/HORLOGER-AVEUGLE-L-Richard-Dawkins/dp/2221090071"><em>horloger aveugle</em></a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gillesenvrac.ca/carnet/2009/11/simulations-du-cerveau/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

