Sex and Death: An Introduction to Philosophy of Biology
Paul E. Griffiths Kim Sterelny  
Sex and Death: An Introduction to Philosophy of Biology Image Cover
Additional Images
Maison d'édition:University Of Chicago Press
Genre:Philosophie, Biologie
Pages:456
ASIN:0226773043
ISBN:9780226773049
Format:Paperback
Édition:1
Date de parution:1999-06-15
Dimensions:1.02 x 8.90 x 6.06 in
Date de l'ajout:2010-09-04
Prix:CDN$ 29.03
Appréciation:3.5 (2 voix)
Résumé: 'Sex and Death' is a pretty ambitious book, being almost a survey of the specific, hot topics in modern philosophy of biology. Tackling such issues as the nitty-gritty, purely philosophical issues of gene selection vs. selection of the organism, the definition and nature of the concept of 'species', and "Life on Earth: the Big Picture", the authors have done a nice job of using a breathtaking array of references, from Dawkins to Gould, Lewontin to Mayr, Alexander to E.O. Wilson, etc.
Unfortunately, keeping all of this succinct makes for a somewhat dry presentation. I agree with the previous reviewer in that often the authors' presentation of concepts are difficult to grasp for those not already familiar with the topics; when more concrete examples are made, the point is much easier to take. Still, this is a minor complaint given the scope and rigor of the analysis presented.
If you're into the accessibility of a Stephen Jay Gould or Richard Dawkins, this book will be a challenge to read. In fact, it reminds me much more of Elliot Sober, one of the more famous Philosophers of Biology cited in this book. As 'an Introduction to Philosophy of Biology', 'Sex and Death' is more accessible than the work of Sober, and it is a well-organized and presented survey of the philosophy of biology, assuming that the reader has already had a fairly ample exposure to the subject. For the uninitiated, it would be better to bone up on Darwin, Gould, Dawkins, Lewontin, Mayr, and Wilson before trying to tackle this book; *frequent* references to these authors are made,and a close familiarity with their ideas is presupposed.